Arizona Vape Retailers Say They Were Duped by Big Tobacco Giant Altria
Small Businesses Accuse Altria of Deceptive Tactics in Flavored Vape Ban Fight
A storm is brewing in Arizona — and it’s not just about flavors. Vape shop owners across the state are speaking out, accusing tobacco giant Altria of misleading them into appearing to support Senate Bill 1603 — a proposed law that would ban nearly all flavored vape products and leave Arizona’s independent vape shops fighting for survival.
The Heart of the Controversy: SB 1603
Senate Bill 1603 would restrict the sale of vapes in Arizona to just 34 FDA-authorized tobacco-flavored products — almost all manufactured by Big Tobacco players like Altria, RJ Reynolds, and Japan Tobacco International. If passed, this bill wouldn’t just limit consumer choice — it could wipe out Arizona's independent vape industry overnight.
Retailers: “We Were Misled”
Several vape shop owners told AZCentral they were tricked into appearing as bill supporters in the state’s official “Request to Speak” system — even though they oppose the ban.
“I thought I was signing a list of banned flavors,” said Casey Chanda, manager of Adobe Wine & Liquor in Phoenix. “Next thing I know, my store is listed as supporting the bill. Why would I support something that would kill my sales?”
Out of nearly 40 store owners listed publicly as supporting the bill, an investigation found most never gave their consent — or didn’t understand what they were signing.
The Real Winners: Big Tobacco
While Altria frames this legislation as a “youth prevention” effort, small business owners see it differently — a strategic power play by Big Tobacco to eliminate independent vape shops and lock down the market.
“This isn’t about protecting kids,” said Phil Butler, manager of Chandler Oil One. “It’s about eliminating competition. Flavored vapes are over half my profits. Without them, I’m done.”
Meanwhile, Customers Lose Out
If SB 1603 passes, adult consumers in Arizona could be left with only a small handful of Big Tobacco-made, tobacco-flavored options. Gone would be the innovative flavors and vape devices preferred by most adult vapor consumers.
Independent brands offer greater value for consumers and provide store owners with a superior profit margin. Altria has every reason to seek a legally protected monopoly. This will serve to either boost the sales of their expensive pod kits or increase cigarette sales, which this study published by the Yale School of Public Health shows to be the most likely outcome.
Even worse? Vape shop owners say enforcement gaps and regulatory loopholes — not flavors — are the real drivers of youth access.
Misleading Tactics Raise Eyebrows
Some store owners claim Altria representatives flat-out lied — suggesting the bill targeted menthol cigarettes, not vapes.
“I think they were dishonest from the beginning,” said Mike Takrouri, owner of Party Stop Market in Glendale. Even after requesting to be removed from the supporter list, his name stayed up.
What Happens Next?
For now, SB 1603 is stalled in the House Appropriations Committee, with no hearing scheduled. But supporters of the bill — including Senator Vince Leach — have vowed to keep pushing.
Meanwhile, Arizona’s small vape retailers are urging lawmakers and consumers to look deeper.
“We’re not against common-sense regulation,” said Alvin Mansar, pharmacist and vape shop owner. “But this isn’t about protecting kids. It’s about Big Tobacco using dirty tricks to crush small businesses.”
Final Thought:
Arizona’s fight over flavored vapes isn’t just a local issue — it’s a warning for vape shop owners across the country.
When Big Tobacco says “we’re here to help,” small businesses better read the fine print.
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.