Skip to content

WARNING: This product contains nicotine.
Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

Cart

Your cart is empty

Article: A Consumer's Guide to Opposing New Jersey's Assembly Bill A1810: Protecting Harm Reduction and Choice

A Consumer's Guide to Opposing New Jersey's Assembly Bill A1810: Protecting Harm Reduction and Choice

A Consumer's Guide to Opposing New Jersey's Assembly Bill A1810: Protecting Harm Reduction and Choice

New Jersey’s Assembly Bill A1810 seeks to ban the sale of flavored cigarettes, non-premium cigars, and oral nicotine pouches. While the motivation to protect public health is commendable, this blog post argues why consumers should oppose this bill, especially concerning the ban on oral nicotine pouches. Oral nicotine pouches look similar to snus but are made with synthetic nicotine rather than tobacco.  

 

The Science Behind Harm Reduction with Nicotine Pouches 

 

Research shows that nicotine pouches are significantly less harmful than traditional cigarettes because they do not involve combustion. The Royal College of Physicians has noted that "nicotine itself is not especially hazardous to health" (Royal College of Physicians, 2016). 

Data published in the GSTHR briefing paper from March of 2023 states that 

“Nicotine pouches are a relatively new safer nicotine product which can provide users of high-risk tobacco with an alternative that poses fewer risks to their health. They are low-tech and have a low environmental impact as they contain no batteries or other electronic components. The rapid growth of the nicotine pouch market, already worth 1.5bn USD globally, shows users of high-risk tobacco find these products acceptable and are switching to them. More scientific research is needed to provide further evidence of their reduced-risk status, but it is already clear they offer the potential to save many lives in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) where high-risk oral tobacco use is prevalent.” 

Effective Cessation Tool: 

Studies support that flavored nicotine products can aid in smoking cessation by making the transition from smoking to less harmful nicotine delivery forms more palatable. A study in the Nicotine & Tobacco Research journal found that flavors in nicotine replacement therapies increase quit rates. 

 

Youth Protection vs. Adult Choice: 

While flavored products are a concern for youth, the FDA has implemented strict age-verification for online sales. The study Associations of Flavored e-Cigarette Uptake With Subsequent Smoking Initiation and Cessation suggests that adult smokers are more likely to use flavored nicotine products in quitting attempts, not just youth. 


 

Economic and Consumer Freedom Implications 

 

Impact on Local Economies: 

Small businesses might suffer from reduced sales of these products, impacting local economies. According to the National Association of Convenience Stores, tobacco products, including nicotine pouches, are significant revenue sources for many small retailers. 

 

Consumer Autonomy: 

The ban could be seen as an overstep into personal choice and reducing consumer freedom. 

 

Legal and Regulatory Concerns 

 

Regulatory Overreach: 

Banning products that serve as alternatives to combustible and oral tobacco products without comprehensive evidence of disproportionate harm to public health could set a concerning precedent for future regulatory actions. 

 

Potential Black-Market Growth: 

Prohibition often leads to black markets, as seen with alcohol during Prohibition in the U.S. This could result in unregulated, potentially more harmful products flooding the market. 

 

 

Assembly Bill A1810, while aimed at reducing nicotine consumption among youths, might inadvertently harm adult smokers by restricting access to nicotine alternatives. Consumers should consider opposing this bill to advocate for more nuanced, evidence-based approaches to public health regulation. 

 

Action Steps for Consumers: 

Fill out the VTA’s Call to Action here 

Engage with Your Legislators: Communicate your concerns about the implications of this bill. 

 

Monitor Legislative Progress: Keep up to date with the bill's status and related health policy discussions. 

 

Educate Peers: Share this information to foster a broader understanding of harm reduction versus blanket bans. 

 

By advocating for policies grounded in science and consumer rights, we can push for legislation that effectively balances public health with individual freedoms. 

 

Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

All comments are moderated before being published.

Read more

Texas’ Flavored Tobacco Ban: A Dangerous Step Backward

Texas’ Flavored Tobacco Ban: A Dangerous Step Backward

Texas State Sen. Carol Alvarado (D-Houston) is once again pushing a flavored tobacco ban that could have devastating consequences for adult consumers, small businesses, and public health. On Frida...

Read more
Zyn Flavor Ban in NY: Why Banning Nicotine Pouches Could Harm Adult Smokers and Personal Choice

Zyn Flavor Ban in NY: Why Banning Nicotine Pouches Could Harm Adult Smokers and Personal Choice

New York lawmakers have proposed a ban on flavored oral nicotine pouches like Zyn, arguing that their fruity and minty flavors appeal to minors. While concerns about youth nicotine use are valid, ...

Read more