New Study Finds Flavored Vape and Tobacco Bans Have No Impact on Youth Smoking and Vaping Rates
State-level tobacco and flavored vape bans in the U.S. have failed to curb youth smoking and vaping rates, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. The research challenges the effectiveness of existing regulations aimed at reducing adolescent tobacco and e-cigarette use, revealing that these policies may not be achieving their intended goals.
Key Findings of the Study
Using data from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveys spanning 2011 to 2021, researchers found:
-
No associations between statewide tobacco and flavor restrictions and smoking or vaping rates.
-
No clear patterns suggesting policy effects varied by age.
-
Minimal changes in how adolescents obtain cigarettes and vaping products, despite policy shifts.
Flavored Vape Restrictions Show Little Effect
The study examined how T21 laws, which prohibit the sale of cigarettes and vaping products to individuals under 21, and flavor restrictions impacted youth smoking and vaping habits. Researchers found no significant correlations between these regulations and tobacco or vape use among adolescents.
Youth Access to Tobacco and Vapes Remains Unchanged
Despite these regulations, researchers found that the way adolescents acquire cigarettes and vaping products has remained largely unchanged.
The study noted: “About half of adolescents report obtaining ENDS from social sources, with some evidence that policies restricting product access may shift adolescents from ENDS retail purchases to social sources. However, adolescents also report purchasing ENDS in retail shops despite restrictions, which has been attributed to retailers’ inconsistent implementation of and compliance with flavor and age restrictions.”
Policy Shortcomings and Future Considerations
The study’s authors emphasize the need to understand and address the shortcomings of current policies. They concluded: “We have demonstrated that current policy efforts to curb adolescent tobacco use, particularly ENDS use, are not sufficient. However, follow-up is needed to assess longer-term policy effects, particularly if additional states implement flavor restrictions and strengthen their T21 and flavor policies.”
Despite widespread adoption of T21 laws, eight states have yet to implement them, and there is significant variation in enforcement across states. Researchers stress that future studies should examine the effectiveness of stricter regulations and their long-term impact on youth tobacco use.
The Bottom Line
This study highlights the limitations of current tobacco and flavored vape bans in reducing youth smoking and vaping. While well-intentioned, these policies may not be addressing the root causes of adolescent tobacco use. Instead, a more comprehensive approach that includes better enforcement, education, and harm reduction strategies may be necessary to make a meaningful impact on youth smoking and vaping behaviors.
